Index

Abstract

The present study is carried out on the green oak forest of Jbel Aoua South, in the Central Middle Atlas. The objective of this work is to estimate the dry biomass of these stands while characterizing this zone in terms of soil and floristic potential. According to the results obtained, the estimated biomass production is 42,70t/ha, based on 30 sample trees using the dimensional analysis method, or an energy equivalent of 192.15106 kcal/ha, which represents a potential income of 3260 to 3586 DH/ha/year. The forage value of the green oak in the forest of Jbel Aoua South is 372 FU/ha. The soil studied is of the para-rendzine carbonate type with a sandy loamy texture, rich in potassium and moderately low in phosphorus.

Keywords: Jbel Aoua South, Central Middele Atlas, Green oak, Biomass, Energy equivalent, Forage value., Para-rendzine

Received:8 June 2018 / Revised: 10 August 2018 / Accepted:14 September 2018/ Published: 18 October 2018

Contribution/ Originality

This study is one of the very few studies which have investigated the matter of estimating the forest biomass of green oak forests in Morocco. This reality is leading to a growing interest in carbon sequestration projects based on woody species that store it in their biomass.


1. INTRODUCTION

The Green oak occupies an important place in the Mediterranean basin, especially in its western part. This has led some botanists to use its range or that of its related associations to delimit the Mediterranean region [1]. It shows very high potential and adaptability in the Mediterranean climate context [2]. It can survive with a minimum rainfall of 250 mm and withstand thermal extremes of -15°C and +42°C [3, 4]. On the edaphic level, it is indifferent to the chemical nature of the soils except perhaps for the fine swampy silts of podzols which constitute an unfavorable environment.

In Morocco, the target area made one and a half million hectares [5] and extended over a considerable space in the country's forest area. It forms the bottom of the Moroccan forest ornament.

The Green oak forests of the Central Middle Atlas play an essential economic, social and ecological role. They produce large quantities of firewood and constitute a crucial grazing area for pastoralists in this region [6]. In some places, these forests also attract bunches of tourist sites, housing diversified recreation and leisure activities and providing effective soil protection against erosion on sloping land [7].

The Green oak, as an energy and forage resource, has attracted the attention of several researchers. Rondeux [8] considers that knowledge of an ecosystem's energy resources necessarily requires knowledge of biomass.
To ensure the sustainability of the Green oak and taking into account its important contribution in the forage balance of the ecosystems of the Moroccan Middle Atlas, a rational management is necessary; therefore, an evaluation of the biomass potential of this species is essential. The objective of this study is to evaluate Green oak biomass in the forest of Jbel Aoua South by developing biomass tariffs at one and two entrances, estimating biomass in respect of its energetic potentiality, the forage balance in terms of green oak leaf biomass and developing a typology of this region in terms of soil and plant characteristics.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in plot 73 of the Jbel Aoua South forest (Figure 1). The geological structure of the area under study is very complicated with numerous repetitions of the middle Lias, limestone and dolomitic layers. Two types of soils are described in the region, namely red fersiallitic soils on limestone and dolomitic limestone and para-rendzine soil on sandy dolomite [9]. The average annual rainfall ranges from 537 mm to 1122 mm and the  minimum temperatures from -4.9° C to -1.3°C, and the maximums range from 29.5°C to 32.5°C. The seasonal regime is Winter-Spring-Summer (H.P.A.E). With regard to snow, the studied area records 20 days of snow annually on average and 50 to 100 days of frost as an indication [6].

Figure-1. Studied area map

Concerning the inventory of the environment and vegetation, data collection was done according to the following steps:

The Physical and chemical analyses were carried out on:         

The techniques used for physical and chemical soil analyses are those adopted by the Rabat Forest Research Centre (CRF).

Estimating biomass is a hard operation and often faces two difficulties: one strictly related to the amount of work required to establish individual biomasses, the other concerns the extrapolation of individual results to the entire stand, which implies the felling of a significant number of trees [10].

Based on the work done by Belghazi and Ezzahiri [10] we retained the semi-destructive or dimensional analysis method in the determination of biomass. The method consists of uprooting 30 sample trees weighted by circumference classes. On fallen trees, the measurements taken are:

Dendrometric Measurements

Weight Measurements
The different parts of each tree (trunk, branches, and leaves) were separated. Weighing concerns:

The washers and leaves sample was put into oven bags in the laboratory and weighed dry.

For the evaluation of the humidity of the various tree components, the dried out weight is used. Indeed, the water content varies according to the seasons and even throughout the day. To determine the dry weight of the samples undertaken, we steamed them for 24 hours at respective temperatures of 105°C for wood and 65°C for leaves [10].  Consequently, the humidity (TH %) and dry weights were calculated according to the following formula:

TH%: Humidity of the sample in percent;
PF: Fresh sample weight;
PS: Dry weight of the same sample.
To determine the plant biomass of forest species, two types of mathematical models were used: single-entry mathematical tariffs and two-entry tariffs.
The models presented below are commonly used to assess forest species biomass [11]:

PS = a0 + a1 C
PS = a0 + a1 C²
PS = a0+ a1C + a2 C2
PS= a0 C a1

PS = a0+ a1 H C²
PS = a0 + a1 C + a2 H C²
PS = a0 Ca1 Ha2
With:                                                               
PS: dry weight;       
C: Circumference at 1.30 m from the ground in (cm);
H: Shaft height;
ai (i = 0, 1, 2): Regression coefficients to be estimated.
The best model is one that meets the following conditions:

 -σr: Residual standard deviation;
 -f ' (yi): first derivative of f (yi) relative to y;
 -yi: dependent variable;
 -n: number of observations.   
If the dependent variable has not undergone any transformation, it is easy to check that this index is equal to the residual standard deviation.

Consequently, the dry biomass of each organ of the tree was estimated by the tariffs used.
Biomass, cultivated or raised by humans, is supposed to renew itself after each use. Biomass is, therefore, a renewable source of energy as long as farming and forestry systems are sustainable and responsible.

Forest biomass is among the most promising energy sources compared to non-renewable energy shortages. The disadvantage of the biomass worth in t/ha is that similar amounts of different biological materials do not necessarily have the same energy value (calorific value). It is thus appropriate to reduce the organic content produced to a common unit which is the calorie (amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one gram of water by 1 degree centigrade).

The conversion table given by Briane [13] and presented in table 01 was used to convert the forest biomass of the green oak stand into energy.

Table-1. Calorific value (CP) of some fuels at the experimental terrain of the South of Jbel Aoua. forest

Fuel
CP en (Kcal/Kg)
CP en (Mj/kg)
Dry wood
4500
18,8
Dry leaves
4700
19,64
Charcoal of wood
7000 à 7500
29 à 31
Oil
10000 à 11000
42 à 46
Peat
5000
20,9
Pure Carbon
8100
34

Source: Briane [13]   

Moreover, the green oak forests of the Middle Atlas are an essential forage source for the user populations and an indispensable component in the restoration of the agro-sylvo-pastoral balance. Qarro, et al. [14] recommended that the "Arbre-Herbe-Animal" balance is necessary to maintain and develop forest and sylvopastoral resources.
The study of these aspects is based on the estimation of the forage value of the foliar phytomass of the green oak forest of Jbel Aoua South, which is evaluated on the basis of 0.1 UF per kg of dry matter [15].

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The statistical study (Figure 2) revealed that the structure of the sample trees is uni-modal and is homothetic to the stand structure.

Figure-2. Structure of sample trees

The outcomes of the moisture calculation for each tree component are recorded in table 2. Indeed, we notice an increase in humidity from the trunk towards the leaves. Compared to the holm oaks of the Central Plain [16] humidity levels are slightly higher (55.7%, 59.2%, and 70.7% respectively for trunk, branches and leaves).

Table-2. Average humidity of each shaft component after steaming

Trunk
Branches
Leaves
Steaming temperature (°C)
105
105
65
drying time (hours)
24
24
24
Average humidity (%)
56,2
63,6
72,1

The biomass rates at one entry express the relations between the dry weight of the trunk (PSTr), branches (PSB), leaves (PSF) and the whole tree (PST) and the circumference at 1.30 m from the ground (C1.30). The results of the estimation of the models using the linear regression technique and their statistical analysis are shown in table 3.

Table-3. Single entry biomass tariffs for sample trees and their statistical analysis

Component
Adjusted models
R2(%)
Sr
IF
d
F
PST = - 20,985+ 1,4 C
90
4,97
4,97
1,41
251,98
Whole tree
PST = - 1,413+ 0,019 C²
94,8
3,59
3,59
1,18
506,31
PST = -1,034 - 0,022 C + 0,02 C²
95,1
3,54
3,54
1,08
262,21
PST = 0,0137 C2,069 
91,2
0,21
0,19
1,52
290,96
PSTr = -20,858 + 1,162 C
90,5
3,99
3,99
1,37
268,27
Trunk 
PSTr = -1,635 + 0,016 C²
92,5
3,50
3,50
1,10
258,69
PSTr = -3,726 + 0,124 C + 0,01C²
92,8
3,55
3,55
1,12
173,73
PSTr = 0,00695 C2,190
90,3
0,23
0,20
1,20
259,91
PSB = -5,654 + 0,236 C
64
1,88
1,88
1,46
49,84
Branches
PSB = -2,044 + 0,003 C²
76,6
1,49
1,49
1,63
95,76
PSB = 8,931 – 0,648 C + 0,012 C²
91,3
0,91
0,91
2,30
153,90
PSB = 0,00262 C1,979
74,2
0,56
0,53
2,16
53,84
PSF = -0,68 + 0,094 C
60,9
0,81
0,81
1,39
43,58
Leaves
PSF = 0,781+ 0,001 C²
71,2
0,68
0,68
1,41
72,55
PSF = 3,621-0,227 C + 0,004 C²
81,4
0,55
0,55
1,63
64,52
PSF = 0,00406 C1,579
69,1
0,72
0,71
1,76
13,61

R²: Coefficient of determination     PSTr : Dry weight of trunk in (Kg)
σr : Residual standard deviation.   PSB: Dry weight of branches in (kg).
IF: Furnival Index.  PSF: Dry weight of leaves in (kg).
d: Coefficient of DURBIN-WATSON.    PST: Dry weight of the whole tree in (kg).
F: FISCHER value    C: The circumference at 1.30 m from the ground

By adjusting the above statistical models based on the values of the parameters mentioned in the methodology, for the varied components of the tree, the related outcomes are as follows;

PSTr = 0,00695 C2,190  for the trunk ;
PSB = 8,931 – 0,648 C + 0,012 C² for the branches;
PSF = 3,621 – 0,227 C + 0,004 C² for the leaves;
PST = 0,00968 C2,133 for the whole tree.

For the biomass tariffs with two entrances, they give the dry weight of the whole tree according to the circumference at 1.30 m from the ground and the total height of the tree. These rates are shown in table 4.

Table-4. Biomass tariffs with two entries for sample trees and their statistical analysis

Models 
R2(%)
σr 
IF
d
F
PST= 3,245+0,003 C2H
95
3,56
3,56
1,89
529,56
PST= -0,848 + 0,349 C + 0,002 C² H
95,4
3,48
3,48
1,92
277,25
PST= 0,0164 C1,774 H0,566
93,5
0,18
0,17
2,26
193,36

R²: Coefficient of determination PSTr : Dry weight of trunk in (Kg)
σr : Residual standard deviation. PSB: Dry weight of branches in (kg).
IF: Furnival Index. PSF: Dry weight of leaves in (kg).
d: Coefficient of DURBIN-WATSON. PST: Dry weight of the whole tree in (kg).
F: FISCHER value C : The circumference at 1.30 m from the ground
H : The total tree height in (m)

Based on the above statistical criteria, the model judged to be the most efficient of the three models tested is the following:

PST= -0,848 + 0,349 C + 0,002 C² H

The application of the biomass rates used for each organ of the tree, and for the whole tree enabled us to estimate the total dry biomass per hectare. According to table 05, the average total biomass per hectare is about 42.70 t at age 30. The share of each organ (trunk, branches, and leaves) in this biomass is 72.18%, 19.11% and 8.71% respectively.

Table-5. Total biomass per hectare per component of tree in (t/ha)

Component
Biomass in (t/ha)
Trunk
30,82
Branches
8,16
Leaves
3,72
Whole tree
42,70

The comparison of biomass values with others obtained in other regions of Morocco showed that except for the forests of Tafchna and Regadda in the Middle Central Atlas [17] the green oak forest of the studied area has considerable biomass potential, compared to other stands of similar ages (Table 06). This can be explained, probably, by the high density of the studied stand as well as by the ecological conditions of the forest of Jbel Aoua South which are more favorable than those of the other Moroccan forests considered.

Table-6. Biomass of some holm oak  studied in Morocco

Studied area
author
Biomass (T/ha) and age of holm oak  
Trunk
Branches
shoots
Leaves
whole
Age
Central Middle Atlas
(forest of Tafchna)
-
-
-
-
96
30
Central Middle Atlas
(forest of Regadda)
86,4
30
Central Middle Atlas
12,56
3,64
2,95
1,50
20,65
41
Eastern Middle Atlas
(experimental terrain of Bab Bou Ider)
9,93
1,49
3,09
1,99
16,50
22
Central Middle Atlas
(experimental terrain of Dayat Aoua)
--
--
--
--
24,30
28
Central plain
(forest of Ait hatem)
13,07
7,37
2,05
1,97
24,90
32
Central plain
(experimental terrain of Boukachmir)
24,55
14,22
1,47
40,24
46

Similar studies conducted in some holm oak groves around the Mediterranean [21] show that, except for the Oued yagoub massif in Algeria where the biomass is only 9.29 t/ha, holm oak groves on the northern shore of the Mediterranean, particularly in France and Italy (Table 07), have more remarkable biomass of this species (65 to 150 t/ha).

Table-7. Biomass of some holm oak  studied in the Mediterranean basin

Author
Studied area
Country
Age
Biomass in t/ha
Forest of ouled yagoub
Algeria
27
9,29
Mte Minardo
Italy
31
150
Puéchabon
France
41
65
Rians
France
30-May
81

The estimate of the energy equivalent of green oak biomass in the forest of Jbel Aoua South is given in table 08.

Table-8. Energy equivalent of the average biomass of the different components of the holm oak tree

Component
Biomass      (t/ha)
Energy equivalent 
Equivalent in coal 
Equivalent in fuel (l/ha)
(106 kcal/ha)
(t/ha)
Trunk
30,82
138,69
18,49 à 19,81
13 869 à 15 256
Branchs
8,16
36,72
4,90 à 5,24
3672 à 4039,2
Leaves
3,72
16,74
2,23 à 2,39
1674 à 1841,4
Whole tree
42,70
192,15
25,62 à 27,45
19 215 à 21 136,5

This table shows that the forest of Jbel Aoua South produces 192.15 106 Kcal/ha, equivalent to 19215 to 21136.5 l/ha of fuel oil or 120.04 to 132.04 barrels/ha of crude oil, corresponding to a production of 4 to 4.4 barrels/ha/year. If we take into account the current value of a barrel of crude oil which is of the order of 815 DH, this forest can generate a potential income of 3260 to 3586 DH/ha/year.

The contribution to livestock production in forests is generally very important and can greatly exceed wood production. Table 09 represents the forage equivalent of the studied forest. This table shows that this value is relatively high, in comparison to others found by Boulmane [17] in the forests of Tafechna and Reggada in the Middle Central Atlas which are of the order of 221 UF/ha and 259 UF/ha respectively. This improved production could be linked to the favorable climatic conditions in the Ifrane area, which receives more than 1000 mm of rainfall annually, which conditions a favorable water balance in the soil and significant foliation of trees. The high density of the studied stand also contributed to the improvement in this forage value. Moreover, if this production is taken into account, it cannot meet the needs of the plethora of herds that spend more than four months a year in the forest during the dearth period.

Table-9. Forage value of pure holm oak from the Jbel Aoua forest

Leaf biomass (t /ha)
Age (an)
Forage value (UF/ha)
3,72
30
372

For more information on the soil studied and to understand its qualities, morphological and physico-chemical characteristics were studied.

Description of the Station

Natural vegetation (or planting): Young evergreen oak, cedar and juniper oxycedar coppice.

3.1. Morphological Description of the Profile

The morphological description of the profile studied is shown in table 10.

Table-10. Morphological description of the soil studied at the level of the experimental terrain of the forest of Jbel Aoua South

 Soil horizon
Depth  (Cm)
Description
L
6,5-4,5
Undecomposed litter. The transition is straight and very sharp.
F
4,5-4
Litter partially decomposed. The transition is straight and very sharp.
H
Apr-00
Dark brown (10YR 3/3) when dry, black (10YR 2/1) when wet. The transition is very diffuse.
A1
0-30
Dark yellowish brown (10YR 3/4) when dry, very dark brown (10YR 2/2) when wet. The texture is sandy. The structure is quite lumpy. Consistency: no plasticity and poor cohesion. Very porous. Coarse roots are rare, horizontal and oblique, medium roots are rare and without specific orientation, and hairs are medium and without specific orientation. HCL effervescence is low. The transition is strongly undulated and net limit
C
30-70
Mother rock sandy dolomite. Presence of altered dolomitic rocks.

Soil Classification

3.2. Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis

The results of the soil physical and chemical analysis are summarized in table 11.

Table-11. Soil physical and chemical analysis

Soil horizon
PH H2O
PH KCl (1 N)
Clay (%)
Silt (%)
Sand (%)
M O
C
N
C/N
P2O5
K2O
F
G
F
G
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(ppm)
(ppm)
A1
7,68
7,36
5
10
32
51,8
1,2
3,05
1,79
0,20
8,95
22,41
127,8
C
8,03
7,87
0
0
15
83,3
1,7
0,55
0,32
0,03
10,7
23,49
55,6

F: Fine G: Gross MO: Organic substance C: Carbon N: Nitrogen

Analysis of this table has indicated that the target soil has a slightly alkaline pH for both A1 and C horizons, indicating good biological activity at both horizons. The Soil grain size analysis pointed out that the soil is rich in sand (53% and 85% respectively for the A1 and C horizons, of which 98% are fine sands and 2% coarse sands for both horizons).

The texture is loamy sandy for the A1 horizon and sandy loam for the C horizon.

The organic matter rate was 3.05% in horizon A1 with a decrease of 82.12% towards horizon C (0.55%). Rendzin or para-rendzin soils are known by a blockage or concentration of organic parts in the A1 surface horizon [24].

The C/N ratio, whose values of 8.95% for the A1 horizon and 10.7% for the C horizon are less than 16, which indicates, according to Bonneau [24] standards, that the mineralization process outweighs the nitrogen N immobilization process.     

Meanwhile, while applying these standards, the soil studied is characterized by good potassium fertility and phosphorus poverty in the A1 horizon (respectively 0.33 meq/100g and 0.022 per thousand).

4. CONCLUSION

The objective of this work is to evaluate the standing biomass within an experimental terrain installed in the forest of Jbel Aoua South, on an area of one hectare. The results of this study show that:

Consequently, a regulation of the grazing process in this zone and an organization of the user population of the forest of Jbel Aoua South for a sustainable use of pastoral resources, through the practice of participatory silvicultural pipes (depressing by the population) allow these populations to benefit from the forage units necessary for their herds.

Funding: This study received no specific financial support.   
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 
Contributors/Acknowledgement: All authors contributed equally to the conception and design of the study.

REFERENCES

[1]          R. Rol, Flora of shrubs and shrubs trees 3 Mediterranean region. Paris: The Rustic House, 1968.

[2]          L. Emberger, General overview on the vegetation of Morocco at 1/50000. Berne: Hans Huber, 1939.

[3]          Barry, Record of the international map of vegetation and ecological conditions - Algiers Leaf at 1 / 1,000,000. Algiers: Soc. Hist. Nat. North, 1976.

[4]          C. Sauvage, Geobotanical researches on moroccan suberas. Rabat: Trav. Inst. Sci. Cherifien, Botanical Series, 21, 1961.

[5]          O. Mhirit and M. Et-Tobi, Forest ecosystems in the face of climate change: The situation and prospects for adaptation in Morocco. Curriculum "Climate Change: Impacts on Morocco and Global Adaptation Options. Morocco: IRES, 2010.

[6]          M. Alami, "Dendrometric and silvicultural study of depressed green oak (Quercus rotundifolia lamk.) At the forest level of the Central Middle Atlas (Case of Ifrane Province)," presented at the Medium of the 3rd Cycle, ENFI, Salé Morocco, 2010.

[7]          A. Kamil, "Modeling of the biomass and mineralization of the holm oak in the Central Middle Atlas (Tafechna Forest)," 3rd Cycle Thesis, ENFI, Salé, Morocco, 2006.

[8]          J. Rondeux, Production Tables for Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.). Gembloux, Belgium: Agronomic Press, 1989.

[9]          P. Billaux and G. Bryssine, "Soils of Morocco," presented at the Congress of Pedology Médeterrannénne, 1st par, Chap 3, Cah, Rech, Agr, Rabat, 1967.

[10]        B. Belghazi and M. Ezzahiri, Foliar biomass of green oak (Quercus rotundifolia Lam.) As a fodder resource: Example of oak forests in the Middle Atlas vol. 13. Central Plateau and Eastern Morocco, Drought, 2002.

[11]        F. Miglioreti, "Phytoecology of Quercus ilex L. and Quercus pubesccns Willd. in Gardiolede Rians (Var). Methodological approach to evaluate the phytomass of green oak coppices," Thesis 3'cycle, Saint-Jérôme. Marseille, + Annexes, 1983.

[12]        J. Tranchefort, Regression: Application to agronomy. Paris: ITCF, 1984.

[13]        D. Briane, Technical guide to carbonization: The manufacture of charcoal. Edisud: Aix-en-Provence, 1985.

[14]        M. Qarro, M. Sabir, B. Belghazi, and M. Ezzahiri, "Effects of silvopastoral treatments on the development of grassland potential in coppice (Quercus ilex L.)," in Proceedings of the Workshop on Silvo-Pastoralism, ENFI, Morocco, 25-28 October 1995. Annals of Forest Research in Morocco, 1996, pp. 58-69.

[15]        M. Makhloufi, "Methodological approach to evaluate the phytomass of holm oak thickets in the middle central Atlas," Postgraduate Memory. ENFI, 1992.

[16]        H. Dahane, "Assessment of tree biomass and biodiversity in the Central Plateau green oak (case of the Boukachmir Experimental Scheme)," 3rd Cycle Thesis, ENFI, Salé, Morocco, 2001.

[17]        M. Boulmane, Biomass, mineral oil and nutrients returning to the soil in the Quercus Ilex of the Middle Moroccan Atlas. Morocco: Forest Research Center, Rabat, 2013.

[18]        A. Lahmini, "Evaluation of the phytomass of green oak coppice (Quercus Rotundifolia Lam) Middle Eastern Atlas (Case of Chiker Forest)," Postgraduate Thesis, ENFI, Salé, Morocco, 1993.

[19]        A. Moussaoui, "Green Oak of the middle atlas: Production, structures and increments (case of the experimental device of Bab Bou Ider and Dayet Aoua)," 3rd Cycle Thesis, ENFI, Salé, Morocco, 1995.

[20]        S. Aoid, "Stand type mapping, biomass study and green Oak production in the Ait Hatem forest (Central Plateau) for management," 3rd Cycle Thesis, ENFI, Salé, 1997.

[21]        W. Zitouni, "Growth and productivity of a green oak mulch at the edge of the pine forest Ain Mimoun - Ouled yagoub massif," Majester's Dissertation in Agronomic Sciences, El Hadj lakhdar University, Batna, Algeria, 3,7,8,12, 2010.

[22]        S. Leonardi and M. Rapp, "Phytomass production and use of bioelements in the reconstruction of a holm oak coppice," Acta Oecologica, vol. 11, pp. 819-834, 1990.

[23]        Floret, "Organization of the structure, biomass and mineralogy of a coppice of green oak (Quercus ilex L.)," Acta Oecologica, Oecol. Plant, vol. 10, pp. 245-262, 1989.

[24]        M. Bonneau, A century of teaching and research in forest soil science. France: Forest Review, 1983.

Views and opinions expressed in this article are the views and opinions of the author(s), Journal of Forests shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content.