Fish is a protein source of high nourishing value consumed in the entire world. In Saharan countries it is consumed fresh, however as dried or smoked. However, fish is subject to both fungal and mycotoxins contamination. This study aims to identify fungal presumed producing mycotoxin and to evaluate the contamination level of aflatoxins B1, B2, and G2. A total of 150 samples of dried and smoked fish (Clarias sp. and Oreochromis sp.) have been collected in different islands of the Fitri lake. Standard methods of microbiology have been used for fungal isolation and identification. Aflatoxins content in fish has been determined using HPLC associate to GCMS. Fifty samples (50) were contaminated by four major fungal kinds. Frequency of fungal was to 40 % (Aspergillus niger), 26 %(Aspergillus fumigatus), 20 % (Mucor sp), 8% (Curvularia spp)and 6% (Scycadium). Twenty (20) samples suspected to be contaminated and analyzed, only seven (7) was contaminated with aflatoxins (B1, B2 and G2). The aflatoxin contamination level vary according to the fish species. Clarias sp. samples are 50 % contaminated by aflatoxins when Oreochromis spare 20 % contaminated. Aflatoxins rates ranged from 0.01 to 2.78 and 0.09 to 0.32 µg/Kg respectively for aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin B2 for Clarias spand from 0 to 0.4 µg/Kg of aflatoxin B2 for Oreochromis sp. The mycotoxins level is in average high than the European Union recommendation for dried product. These results call for more sensitization and training for producer for safe dried and smoked fish.
Keywords: Dried fish, Smoked fis, Fungal, Aflatoxin, Contamination, Chad.
Received: 28 June 2019 / Revised: 31 July 2019 / Accepted: 6 September 2019/ Published: 29 October 2019
This study is one of the very few studies which have investigated the contamination level of aflatoxins B1, B2, and G2 in dried and smoked fishes (Clarias sp and Oreochromis sp.) from Fitri lake in Chad.
Fish is an important source of nutriments and animal proteins for a large part of the world population (Koranteng et al., 2014). Many processes are used for fish transformation and cooking in several countries in the Sahel. Fish is a protein source more than cow and pig meat and poultries. Fishing and aquaculture in the world provided about 167.2 million tons of fish in 2014. 93.4 % is provided by fishing. About 143 million tons of fish are destined to the human food. Other studies show that more than 90 % of the world production are destined to human consumption (Gumy et al., 2014; United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, 2018). Fish production in Africa was estimated to more than 9.7 millions of tons in 2012 and is about 6 % of the world production (UNFAO, 2016). The contribution of Africa to the world production in increasing during the last 10 years because of the aquaculture in soft water in sub-Saharan Africa countries (UNFAO, 2018). In Chad, fishing is practiced in all type of surface waters including streams (Chari and Logone) and Lakes (lake Chad, lake Fitri, lake Toupouris and lake Iro) (CBLT, 2007). Fishing have an important place in the national economy and in communities’ food security. Despite the fact that the national potential in fish production is estimate to about 186 500 tons, the production sometimes reaches 373 000 tons in a year of good raining. About 35% of this production is from Lake Chad and 65% from streams, flooded plains and secondary lakes Fish is a highly perishable food (Programme National de Sécurité Alimentaire PNSA, 2015). It can alter itself immediately after its capture more than any other food. At this step microbial proliferation, chemical compound change and endogenous enzymes deterioration make it quickly unfit to consumption and even dangerous for human health. There is a high percentage of losses and quality impairment after fishing with all the risks that ensue for the consumer's health (UNFAO, 2016). Dried and smoked fish may be contaminating by several pathogenic microorganisms as fungal flora susceptible of public health problem throughout their secondary metabolites (aflatoxins). Mycotoxins in found in a large skin of foodstuffs. According to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), about a quarter of the world production of different foodstuffs are contaminated which is responsible of significant economic loss. Cancer intoxications, immunotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity are part of fungal toxins effects in human body (Gauthier, 2016). Mycotoxins are chemical compound mainly produced by fungal belonging to the Aspergillus, Penicilliums and Fusariums kinds (Khiat and Insaf, 2014). Food safety is nowadays an increasing preoccupation for consumers and of public utilities (Naima, 2017). The management of the risk passes therefore by the prevention of the contamination of the raw material, the respect of the good practices of hygiene’s and a good knowledge on the storage. To avoid food contamination, there is a necessity of sensitization and training of associate human resources in fish production in good hygiene practice, good production and storage practices. An evaluation of the contamination level is then needed to take right decision. This study then aims to evaluate possible toxigenic fungal and aflatoxins level in dried and smoked fish from Chad.
Clarias sp and Oreochromis sp are the biological material. Acetonitrile, nitric acid, bromide of potassium, Methanol, Phosphate Salin Buffer, Standard B1 B2, G1, and G2 aflatoxins are the chemical reagent. Immuno Afinity Colums (ref PF-AFBG-3 Libios) was the specific column.
2.1. Methods
2.1.1. Sampling
A total of 150 samples of dried and smoked fish including both Clarias sp and Oreochromis sp species have been collected in Birguimi, Maguiti, Doumrou, and Moudou, different islands of the Fitri Lake. The weight of each sample is about 300g. After identification of mycotoxin producer fungal, twenty (20) samples of contaminated samples have been selected for aflatoxins quantification.
2.1.2. Mycotoxin Producer Fungal Identification
2.1.2.1. Purification of Toxigenic Isolate Fungal
The preparation of samples and tenfold dilution for inoculation on Sabouraud containing chloramphenicol is carried out according to ISO 6887-1 (1999). Incubation is done under 30°C for 72 hours. Presumed toxigenic fungal are collected. These isolates are repiqued twice to get pure fungal cell which are kept in cryotubes containing Czapek Yeast Extratlted agar at 4°C (Botton et al., 1999).
Table-1 . Diversity of potential mycotoxins producer fungal.
2.1.3. Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 Analyses
The aflatoxins have been quantify using Chromatography Liquid High Performance with derivation post column after a purification on column of immuno-affinity according to Norm European (pr EN 14123). Presumed toxigenic samples where was isolated presumed toxigenic fungal are concerned with the mycotoxins analyses using an extraction solution (Elalami and Abdelouahed, 2014).
2.1.3.1. Extraction
Twenty-five gram (25 g) of every sample have been weighed and ground to obtain a fine powder which allow the release of toxins. Then 5 g of every obtained powder are introduced in a small plastic bottle containing 125 mL of the extraction solution previously prepared. The bottle is then agitated during 20 min. A Wattman filter paper is used to filter the previous solution in a tube containing Phosphate Buffer Saline.
2.1.3.2. Detection and Quantification
Immuno Afinity Colums (ref PF-AFBG-3 Libios) are used for purification. Respectively 15 mL of the extracted solution and 1.5 mLis introduced in every column following by 0.5 mL of distilled water. Standard of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1 and G2 are used. Detection and quantification are perfomed with fluorescence detector (HPLC/FLD) and a photochemical post-column reactor according to ISO 16050 (2003).
3.1. Diversity of Toxicogenic Fungal
The cultural and microscopic observation showed five different fungal species in the Table 1. Identified species included Aspergillus Niger, Aspergillus fumigatus, Mucor spp, Curvularia spp and Scycadium dimidiatum.
A total of fifty species have been isolated in all the samples. Among these fungal species, Aspergillus Niger is the more abundant (40%) followed by Aspergillus fumigatus (26 %) and Mucor spp (20 %). Scycadium dimidiatum is the less representative fungal species. The frequency of each isolated fungal is as showed in Table 2.
Table-2 . Frequency of isolated fungal species.
Species | Number |
Frequency (%) |
Aspergillus Niger | 20 |
40 |
Aspergillus fumigatus | 13 |
26 |
Mucor spp | 10 |
20 |
Curvularia spp | 4 |
8 |
Scycadium dimidiatum | 3 |
6 |
Total | 50 |
100 |
From the 150 collected samples, 50 of them are contaminated whith. The contamination rate is then about 30%. The percentage of contaminated samples is very high. Knowing that fungals growth in relative high humidity area, this importance of contamination reveal then an inappropriate process of dried and smoked fish or inappropriate storage conditions of fish. Dried and smoked fish are store around the lake where humidity is relatively higher. The following picture is an evidence of inappropriate storage conditions which is an important factor in fungal growth Figure 1.
Figure-1. Dried procces (a) and storage environment (b).
All the isolated fungal belong to four kinds of pathogenic fungal. It’s Aspergillus, Mucor, Curvularia and Scycadium. The frequency of each fungal is 40 % for Aspergillus Niger, 26 %for Aspergillus fumigatus, 20 % Mucor spp 8 % for Curvularia spp and 6 % for Scycadium dimidiatum. Aspergillus Niger is then the more frequent among the pathogenic fungal. Previous studies in Algeria, Burkina Faso and Chad also reveal Curvularia, Aspergillus and Mucor sppas the major pathogenic fungal in dried food (Tidjani et al., 2008; Mahibeb, 2015; Compaore et al., 2016). The frequency of fungal kinds here found is also similar to some previous studies Rebbouh (2016) and Laaid et al. (2009); Fatima et al. (2016) and Tidjani et al. (2007;2008). Other fungal species such as Aspergillus falvus, Aspergillus aculeatus, and Aspergillus tubingenisis have been isolated in dried fish by Ni et al. (2018). The predominance of Aspergillus kind among the contaminating flora of dried fish has been reported in several works (Le and Bars, 1987; Riba et al., 2005). Aspergillus kind protect itself throughout spores. Its spores is then spread in several areas and contaminate seral foods. Aspergillus have an important growth factor in an unappropriate storage conditions according to Hocking (2006). For Pihet et al. (2007) the contamination of dried and smoked fishes may occur during the process. For, the process is make on uncleaned green grass where previous fish have been dried. The perpetual contamination may then happen.
3.2. Aflatoxin Content of Fish
Aflatoxin B2 and aflatoxin B1 are the more abondant mycotoxins in Clarias sp fish. The content of these mycotoxins varie from 0.01 to 2.78 and 0.09 to 0.32 respectively for aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin B2. Their is not a contamination in aflatoxin G1 in all the analyzed samples. Two samples present a content in aflatoxin G2 which level varie from 0.55 to 1.60. The level of aflatoxin in Carias sp. fish is as showed in the following Table 3.
Table-3. Aflatoxins level in Clarias sp.Fish.
Fish species |
Samples |
AFB1 |
AFB2 |
AFG1 |
AFG2 |
Quantity (µg/ g) |
|||||
Clarias sp |
E 1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Clarias sp |
E 2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Clarias sp |
E 3 |
0.01 |
0.09 |
- |
- |
Clarias sp |
E 4 |
- |
0.14 |
- |
1.60 |
Clarias sp |
E 5 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
- |
- |
Clarias sp |
E 6 |
0.13 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
Clarias sp |
E 7 |
0.86 |
0.32 |
- |
- |
Clarias sp |
E 8 |
- |
0.30 |
- |
- |
Clarias sp |
E 9 |
2.78 |
- |
- |
0.55 |
Clarias sp |
E10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Among Oreochromis sp fish samples analyzed, two reveal the presence of aflatoxin B2. None of the other mycotoxin is detected. The contamination in aflatoxin B2 from 0 to 0.4 µg/Kg. The level in the mycotoxin content of each Oreochromis sp fish is as presented in Table 4.
Table-4. Aflatoxins level in Oreochromis sp fish.
Fish species |
Samples |
AFB1 |
AFB2 |
AFG1 |
AFG2 |
Quantity (µg/ g) |
|||||
Oreochromis sp |
E 1 |
- |
0.04 |
- |
- |
Oreochromis sp |
E 2 |
- |
0.40 |
- |
- |
Oreochromis sp |
E 3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Oreochromis sp |
E 4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Oreochromis sp |
E 5 |
- |
- |
- |
|
Oreochromis sp |
E 6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Oreochromis sp |
E 7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Oreochromis sp |
E 8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Oreochromis sp |
E 9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Oreochromis sp |
E10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Nine of the twenty fish samples have been contaminated by aflatoxin. The results also showed a contamination of aflatoxins B2, B1 and G2 in fish samples. Clarias sp samples (50 %) are more contaminated by aflatoxins than Oreochromis sp(20 %). The high contamination level is also founded among Clarias sp samples (2.78 µg/Kg).
The drying and smoking process of Oreochromis last more than Clarias sp one. It may have dried or smoke less well than Clarias sp. As moisture, content in very important. Eventual residual water allowed mycotoxins contamination. The mycotoxin level here found is less than those of Olajuyigbe et al. (2014). He works reveal of aflatoxins level range between 1.05 and 25.00 µg/kg for aflatoxin B1 and from 10 µg/kg to 20 µg/kg for aflatoxin B2. Josefa et al. (2018) and Sa’adatu et al. (2019) also noted a signifiquant level of aflatoxin B1, B2, and G2 in the dried fish and other food products. Atef et al. (2011) also found in Egyptian fish, a level of aflatoxin varying 32.0 to 96.0 µg/kg for aflatoxin B1 and from 22.0 to 70.5 µg/kg for aflatoxin B2. In Burkina Faso Pane et al. (2012) found in cereals a contamination level of 7.367 to 16.573 µg/kg for aflatoxin B1 and 0.595 to 1.736 µg/kg for aflatoxin B2. Despite of the relative contamination level, le quantity found is high than the European norm (2010). To this recommandation the acceptable level of aflatoxin in cereals is of 2 µg/kg for aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin 4 µg/kg for both aflatoxin B2, G1 and G2. Aflatoxin B1 is more toxic than aflatoxin B2, G1 and G2. Cole and Cox (1981) demonstrate that the toxicity aflatoxin G1, B2 and G2 are respectively 50, 80 and 90 % than the aflatoxin B1 ones. The toxic effects of aflatoxins have been largely proved (Pier et al., 1980; Pier et al., 1986; Mahibeb, 2015; Ninoek et al., 2015).
In conclusion, this study reveals a high contamination of fish by potential toxigenic fungal. The representative fungal found are Aspergillus, Mucor, Curvularia and Scycadium. The high contamination level reveal lake in good hygiene practice during the process and the storage and call for more sensitization and training for producers. The presence of aflatoxins (B1, B2 and G2) contamination level is an evidence of probable human toxicity in large level. The contamination of Clarias sp samples (50%) more than Oreochromis sp also put in evidence lake in the process mastery. There is a need in followings study to evaluate factors that have an incidence on fungal contamination and their mastery and emergency for public leaders to take right decision for appear to be a public health problem.
Funding: This study received no specific financial support. |
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. |
Contributors/Acknowledgement: Authors sincerely acknowledge National Laboratory of Public Health in Burkina Faso and National Reference CHU and Mère et enfant CHU for their technical assistance. |
Atef, A.H., A.H. Manal, M. Howayda, M. Rasha and R. Abdel-Dayem, 2011. Detection of aflatoxigenic moulds isolated from fish and their products and its public health significance. Nature and Science, 9(9): 106-114.
Botton, B., A. Breton, M. Fevre, S. Gauthier, P. Guy, J.P. Larpent, P. Reymond, J.J. Sanglier, Y. Vayssier and P. Veau, 1999. Useful and harmful molds. Industrial importance. Paris: Masson. Pp: 12-426.
CBLT, 2007. Lake chad basin action program. N'djamena-Chad. pp: 5
Cole, R.J. and R.H. Cox, 1981. Handbook of toxic fungal metabolites. New York: Academic Press. pp: 1-66.
Compaore, H., H. Sawadogo-Lingani, A. Savadogo, D. Dianou and A.S. Traore, 2016. Isolation and morphological characterization of mold producing antibacterial substances from local foods in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 10(1): 198-210.Available at: https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v10i1.15.
Elalami, L. and H. Abdelouahed, 2014. Mycotoxins in food: Responsible microorganisms, Health risk assessment and analytical techniques, graduation project, Cadi University Ayyad Semlalia Faculty of Sciences Marrakech, Department of Applied Biology at the Plant Production. pp: 49.
Fatima, M.S., A.N. Idris and T. Gloria, 2016. Mycological evaluation of smoked-dried fish sold at Maiduguri metropolis, Nigeria: Preliminary findings and potential health implications. Applied Microbiology, 2(4): 2471-9315.
Gauthier, A., 2016. Mycotoxins in food and their impact on health, (Thesis in Pharmaceutical Sciences). University of Bordeaux, UFR of Pharmaceutical Sciences, (UNI B. NO. 43).
Gumy, A., D. Soto and R. Morales, 2014. Practical implementation of the ecosystem approach to shrimp fisheries and aquaculture in the countries of the Central American integration system (SICA / OSPESCA). Atelier FAO / OSPESCA (Organization of the Central American Isthmus Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector), San Salvador, 18-21 June 2012.Fisheries and Aquaculture Reports, (33), Rome, FAO. pp: 45.
Hocking, A.D., 2006. Aspergillus and related teleomorphs, Food Science Australia. Wood Head Publishing. pp: 451-487.
Josefa, T., J.B. Francisco, F. Guillermina and F. Emilia, 2018. Mycotoxin incidence in some fish products: Quechers methodology and liquid chromatography linear ion trap tandem mass spectrometry approach. Molecules, 24(527): 1-11.
Khiat, N. and K. Insaf, 2014. The confrontation of fungal strains isolated from the burnt forest floor of the Milia Region, University of Castantine1, Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences, Department of Microbiology of Fungi. pp: 61.
Koranteng, K.A., M.C. Vasconcellos and B.P. Satia, 2014. Preparation of management plans for selected fisheries in Africa -baseline reports. FAO, Propjet EAF-Nansen, Report, Rome: FAO, 23: 60.
Laaid, D., B. Zakaria, K. Nouraddine and A.W. Abdelhakim, 2009. Effect of secondary metabolites (mycotoxins) of Aspergillus fres. On germination in some varieties of chickpea. Journal of Agricultural Sciences of the University of Damascus, 25(1): 95-106.
Le, B.J. and P. Bars, 1987. Molds of foodstuffs and their consequences. Conferences Given during the Meeting of the "Section Midi Pyrénées" in Toulouse.
Mahibeb, N., 2015. Study of molds potentially producing mycotoxins isolated from durum wheat grains (treated and untreated), Presentation Submitted to Obtain the Master's Degree, University of the Mentouri Constantine Brothers, Faculty of Medicine Sciences of Nature and Life, Algeria. pp: 107.
Naima, M., 2017. Study of the contamination of cereal products by mycotoxins: The case of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, fumonisins, (PhD Thesis). Mohammed University, (UNI.MV No. 3001).
Ni, M.A.S., N.S. Dewa, B.W.G. Ida, N.A.S. Gusti and K. Khamdan, 2018. Identification of contaminant Fungi on Pedetan, and dry fish product of Lemuru (Sardinella lemuru). Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 8(6): 2224-3208.
Ninoek, I., H. Irma, H. Izhamil and S.R. Endang, 2015. Prevalence of Aflatoxin B1 in Commercial dried fish from some regions of Java, Squalen Bull. of Mar. and fish. Postharvest and Biotech, 12(3): 107-115.
Olajuyigbe, O., G. Akande, C. Ezekiel and M. Ezekiel, 2014. Aflatoxigenic moulds and aflatoxin contamination of retailed fishery products in Lagos markets. Mycotoxicology, 15(1): 57-63.
Pane, B.O.S., A.N. Philippe, B. Nicolas, S. Aly and S.T. Alfred, 2012. Aflatoxigenic potential of Aspergillus spp. isolated from groundnut seeds, in Burkina Faso, West Africa. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 6(11): 2603-2609.
Pier, A.C., J.L. Richard and S.J. Cysewski, 1980. The implications of mycotoxins in animal disease. Journal American Veterinary Medicine Association, 5(176): 719-725.
Pier, A.C., M.J. Varman, R.R. Dahlgren, E.L. Belden and L.R. Maki, 1986. Aflatoxic suppression of cell-mediated immune response and interactions with T-2 toxin in: Steyn, P.S. and Vleggar, R., eds. Mycotoxins and Phycotoxins. Elsevier, (Amsterdam). pp: 423-427.
Pihet, M., D. Dubois, C. Le Clec’h, A. Croué, P. Reboul, L. de Gentile and D. Chabasse, 2007. Cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis with scytalidiumdimidiatum in a kidney transplant. Journal of Medical Mycology, 17(2): 109-113.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2007.02.002.
Programme National de Sécurité Alimentaire PNSA, 2015. Strategic Plan for Food Security in Chad, Discussion Paper. pp: 171.
Rebbouh, S., 2016. Isolation and identification of mushrooms associated with white scale parlatoria blanchardi (BLANCHARD, 1868) on some varieties of dates, Dissertation with a view to obtaining the degree of Academic Master, Kasdi Merbah University Ouargla, Faculty of Science of Nature and Life Department of Agricultural Sciences. pp: 110.
Riba, A., N. Sabaou, F. Mathieu and A. Lebrihi, 2005. First investigations on the mushrooms producing Ochratoxin A in the cereal sector in Algeria. Euro-Maghreb Symposium on Biological Chemical Contaminants and Food Security, Fez.
Sa’adatu, A.J., S. Nura and A. Muhammad, 2019. Assessment of mycological quality of smoked African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) sold at Sabon-gari market, Kano Nigeria. Annals of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 1(2): 13-18.
Tidjani, A., D. Agassounon, Y. Ameyapoh, F. Toukourou and C. Souza, 2007. Conservation tests for kilichi dried meat marketed in Chad: Microbiological stability studies. Journal of Scientific Research of the University of Lome, 9(1): 9-17.Available at: https://doi.org/10.4314/jrsul.v9i1.52293.
Tidjani, A., D. Agassounon, M. Tchibozo, S.P. Ouattara, F. Toukourou and D. Souza, 2008. Of aflatoxins in "kilichi" and their ingredients marketed in Chad. Microbiology and Food Hygiene, 20(12): 27-34.
UNFAO, 2016. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Contributed to Food Security and Nutrition for All, Rome. pp: 229.
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, 2018. The global situation of fisheries and aquaculture. Achieve the Goals of Sustainable Development. pp: 254.
Views and opinions expressed in this article are the views and opinions of the author(s), Journal of Food Technology Research shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content. |