Index

Abstract

Quarry industry and its products play an important role in any economy in the world. This study examined the impact of quarry activities on air quality around the neighbouring localities in Ogun State. Eight locations were selected; Isara, Idode, Iwaye, Ogbere, Ilagbe, Adelokun, Baaki Ake, and Igodo.  Air quality was assessed for the concentration of CO2, PM2.5 and PM10 using standard procedures. Samplings were carried out in dry and wet seasons. Data were subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics using SAS package (9.4 version), compared with World Health Organisation (WHO) and the probability of particulate matters causing health hazard was also calculated using Air Quality Index (AQI). PM2.5 and PM10 (dry season) of the surrounding locations were higher than the WHO Limits of 15 and 45 µg/m3 respectively; except the PM10 at Iwaye (32.20±4.18 µg/m3), Isara (35.60±4.38 µg/m3) and Adelokun (42.58±2.74).  In wet season, the PM2.5 (all locations) and only PM10 of Ilagbe ((45.99±3.15), Baaki Ake (50.97±3.13) and Igodo (49.68±2.17) were higher than their corresponding WHO Limits. The AQI of PM2.5 (both seasons) at various locations were in the range of 51 – 100 (moderate). AQI of PM10 dry and wet seasons across locations range 0 – 50 (good); except the PM2.5 of Baaki Ake (51.16) hence, moderate. CO2 concentration at Adelokun (421.73±2.75), Baaki Ake (415.62±5.82) and Igodo (411.85±1.95) (dry season) and Adelokun (405.98±2.60) and Baaki Ake (403.26±1.63) (wet season) surpassed WHO limit (400 µg/m3). The surrounding localities were polluted with CO2 and particulate matters (PM2.5 and PM10) with no health hazard.

Keywords: Air quality, Impact, Localities, Neighbouring, Ogun State, Quarry.

Received: 6 April 2023/ Revised: 22 May 2023/ Accepted: 31 May 2023/ Published: 12 June 2023

Contribution/ Originality

In this study, seasonal variation of the pollution arising from quarries and Air Quality Index were carried out and calculated so as to quantify the level of the pollution respectively. However, sampling size of eight quarries at a time is unprecedented in any investigation on quarry.

1. INTRODUCTION

Quarries have supplied stone for great buildings and civil engineering projects, and for the constructions of roads and railways. It is important because it provides income to State authorities through taxation and creates jobs in areas where there are limited opportunities [1]. Quarries are forms of open mining that produce minerals. The way quarrying is carried out depends on the type of rock and what the rock will be used for, after it is mined. The difference between mining and quarrying is that quarrying is the extraction of the non-metallic mineral (rocks) and aggregates, while mining is the excavation of the metallic mineral deposits. Some of the stones extracted are soilstone, limestone, partite, marble, ironstone, slate, granite, rock salt and phosphate rock [2]. Dust is a major source of air pollution in quarry industry. The extent of pollution by dust depends on the local microclimate conditions, the concentration of dust particles in the ambient air, the size of the dust particles and their chemistry [3]. Dust has effect on both human health and the natural environment by causing a killer disease called ‘silicosis’, through inhalation of minute dust particles that are high in silica [4]. Suspended particulate matter is quite outstanding among all pollutants emanating from quarrying operations [5]. Quarry activities involve blasting and crushing of rock materials and utilization of explosive and heat (fire) for the production of granite chip that may lead to the release of particulate matters and dust. Also, the loading and movement of heavy load trucks on haul routes generate suspended particulates while the crushing of ore and transferring it to a belt conveyor (ore processing) would be a potential source of dust generation. Oguntoke, et al. [6] reported that the highest means of Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) levels among the selected quarries vary between 26.03±1.36 and 11.03±1.52 mg/m3. SPM levels declined significantly (p>0.05) with distance from the drilling and crushing locations at each of the quarry sites. Oguntoke, et al. [6] and Akanwa, et al. [7] reported that the concentrations of the particulate matter in all sampling sites were higher at distance close to quarrying sites and that these concentrations were normally decreased with distance as they dispersed,  but  still  they  had  an  impact  on  human  and environment  in  general. Potential health impacts are almost exclusively linked to the presence of airborne dusts, in particular respirable particles, i.e. those that are less than 10 µm in diameter (also known as PM10). The air pollution is not only a nuisance (in terms of deposition on surfaces) it portends possible effects on health, in particular for those with respiratory problems. Concerning the environmental impact, quarries and stone cutting industries cause ecological disturbance, destruction of natural flora, pollution of air, landscape degradation [8]. It is generally accepted that dust up to 10 µm can be inhaled beyond the larynx and dust up to 4 µm can get into the lungs and cause possible ailment of respiratory and cardio-vascular systems [9-11] .  In wet season, the rain helps in sinking these air pollutants and dusts are wetted and mixed with soil, and some were transported with runoff, thereby reducing its negative impact on the soil Sayara [11] and Akanwa, et al. [7]. Rikhtegar, et al. [12] averred that dry season was the strongest season with respect to dust deposition. The gaseous pollutants emission tendency has been observed by several authors including; Li, et al. [13] they reported that the concentration of pollutants decreases with increases in the altitude.   The concentration of pollutants decreases as distance from the quarry increases; sulphur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and ozone (O3) concentrations in the ambient air were below detection limit. Concentration of carbon monoxide (CO) was highest in the drilling point followed by the crushing section, loading section and workshop place. Generator house had the least concentration of CO Bada, et al. [14]. Peter, et al. [15] investigated the effect of quarrying activities on air quality parameter such as volatile organic compound (VOC), CO, NOx, SOx, at various distances away to the quarrying site and found that the effect of these air pollutants reduce as the distance far away from quarry sites at Ishiagu and Akpoha in Ebonyi State, Nigeria during dry and wet seasons. However, these foregoing prompted to carry out a study to assess the impact of quarries on the air quality in the surrounding villages in Ogun State.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS     

2.1. Study Area

Ogun State lies between latitude 7.9031 and 6.3142  ̊ N to longitude 2.7073 and 4.5750  ̊ E. Ogun State covers a geographical area of 16,980.55 square kilometres with a population of about 3,751,140 [16].The state is within the Rain forest zone of Nigeria and enjoys a tropical climate with distinct wet and dry seasons.  Wet season in Ogun State lasts between seven and eight months; (April to October) and the dry season running through November to February [2].  Furthermore, there is widespre ad distribution of quarry materials; particularly granite in this part of Southwestern Nigeria. It spreads across eight Local Government Area (LGA) within three divisions (Egba, Ijebu and Remo) out of four divisions of ethnic and cultural line in the state; namely Egba, Ijebu, Remo and Yewa. Figure 1 shows location of selected quarry sites in different Local Government Areas in Ogun State.

Figure 1. Location of selected quarry sites in different local government areas in Ogun state.

2.2. Sampling Techniques

Purposive sampling method was used to select eight (8) quarry locations in the study area. Sampling was carried out in eight (8) selected locations communities due to their closeness (500 – 1000 m) to the quarry sites in all six local government areas. Two (2) locations were selected from each of Odeda and Obafemi/Owode Local Government Areas due to the presence of higher number of quarry sites in them. One location was sampled from each of the remaining four (4) Local Government Areas. The air (gaseous pollutants and particulate matter samples) were taken twice; covering both dry and wet seasons during production hours between 8am – 4 pm. Sample locations in each Local Government Area are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Selected quarry sites in Ogun state.
Local government area Locality or village Industry                                              
Remo North Isara CCECC
Obafemi/Owode Adelokun Zanex
Obafemi/Owode Baaki ake Blaco
Ijebu East Ogbere Julius Berger                   
Ijebu North Idode CCECC
Odeda    Igodo F.W.S.AN.H.Concept 2
Ijebu North East Iwaye Paras
Odeda Ilagbe DLK
Shagamu Shagamu Control
Note: CCECC = China civil engineering construction corporation.

2.3. Air Sampling

2.3.1. Gaseous Pollutant

The gases were sampled in November, 2021(dry season) and July, 2022 (wet season) so as to determine level of following; CO2 CO, NO2, SO2 and O3 using Aeroqual – gas sensing (Series 300). Each gas monitored has a sensor head that was attached to the instrument and was initialized for 3 minutes before the reading started. The level of the pollutant started reading and displayed on the meter. The process was repeated for various gas parameters determined during production for three days across all locations. However, mean and standard deviation were calculated. 

2.3.2. Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) Sampling

The measurement of the particle matter (PM10 and PM2.5) were carried in November, 2021(dry season) and July, 2022 (wet season) by employing the respirable dust sampler, APM 460DX and Wins Anderson impactor, APM 550, respectively; during operational hours for 3 days.

All the filter papers (cellulose) of 11 μm size were weighed on a Meter analytical weighing balance before the sampling and desiccated for 24 hours and later placed in the filter holder cassette (PM2.5) and zip lock polybag (PM10) to the field for sampling. The filter papers were loaded on respective samplers and screwed properly before starting the samplers.

After sampling, the loaded filter of PM10 and PM2.5 were removed with forceps, placed in cassette and wrapped in aluminium foils that were put in zip lock for weighing in the laboratory. The means and standard deviation of each three samples (PM10 and PM2.5) per location were calculated.

2.4. Data Analysis

Data generated were subjected to descriptive (mean, standard deviation) and inferential analysis (T-test). The results obtained were compared with [17]. However, the probability of incidence of health hazard by particulate matters was also calculated using Air Quality Index (AQI) [18], as presented in Equation 1.

PMobs = Observed PM (PM2.5 or PM10) concentration in μg/m3
PMmax = Maximum concentration of PM range values that contain or accommodate PMobs.
PMmin = Minimum concentration of PM range values that contain or accommodate PMobs.
AQImax = Maximum AQI range values that corresponds to PMobs.
AQImin = Minimum AQI range values that corresponds to PMobs.

Table 2. Classification ladder for USEPA PM2.5 and PM10 air quality index.
AQI category AQI value 24 Hours average PM2.5 concentration (μg/m3) in air 24 Hours average PM10 concentration (μg/m3) in air
Good 0 –     50 0 – 15.4 0 – 54
Moderate 51 -    100 15.5 – 40.4 55 – 154
Unhealthy for sensitive groups 101 – 150 40.5 – 65.4 155 – 254
Unhealthy 151 – 200 65.5 – 150.4 255 – 354
Very unhealthy 201 -  300 150.5 – 250.4 355 – 424
Hazardous 301 – 500 250.4 – 500.4 425 – 604
Note: United States Environmental Protection Agency [18].

3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Discussion

The values of PM2.5 and PM10 during dry and wet seasons were demonstrated in Table 3. They were also compared with WHO (Limit) 15 μg/m3 24-hour mean and 45 μg/m3 24-hour mean respectively. In dry season, the PM2.5 ranges between 17.8±3.21 – 31.7±3.91 µg/m3 with Iwaye (lowest) and Igodo (highest) respectively and every values of PM2.5  in different locations were higher than the control (12.5±0.31 µg/m3). This implies that quarrying increased particulate matter (PM2.5) of the surrounding environments. Furthermore, all the values of the PM2.5 across locations higher than WHO Limit (15 µg/m3) and there were significant differences among the PM2.5 values across locations. Potential health impacts were almost exclusively linked to the presence of airborne dusts, in particular respirable particles i.e. PM2.5; and have the potential to affect human health, including effects on the respiratory and cardio-vascular systems [1, 10]. In addition the Air Quality Index (AQI) of PM2.5 at Iwaye (55.5), Idode (61.0), Isara (56.7), Ogbere (68.9), Ilagbe (72.8), Adelokun (69.2), Baaki Ake (82.4), Igodo (82.8) all are within AQI values of 51 – 100; implies moderate in term of health implication, while the control (40.58) is within the value of 0 -50 (AQI); implies it is good, as illustrated in Table 2.

Furthermore, in Table 3, the PM10 had Iwaye (32.2±4.18 µg/m3) and Baaki Ake (55.3±4.58 µg/m3) as lowest and highest respectively and were higher than the control (28.2±0.21 µg/m3). The implication of this is that quarry activities increased the PM10 of the environments around the quarries [15]. All these values were higher than the WHO permissible Limit (45 µg/m3), except Iwaye (32.2±4.18 µg/m3), Isara (35.6±4.38 µg/m3) and Adelokun (42.6±2.74). More so, there were significant differences among the PM10 values across the locations. Quarry dust has also been found to cause a killer disease called ‘silicosis’, especially among quarry workers through inhalation of minute dust particles (0.1 to 150 μm) that are high in silica [1]. The AQI for PM10 at Iwaye (29.8), Idode (44.3), Isara (33.0), Ogbere (45.8), Ilagbe (46.2), Adelokun (39.4), Igodo (49.7) and control (26. 1) are within AQI values of 0 – 50; indicates good health, while Baaki Ake (51.16) is within AQI values of 51 – 100; indicating moderation in health as shown in Table 2.

Table 3. Comparison of particulate matter (µg/m3) concentration in dry and wet seasons (N = 3).
  Location
Dry
Wet
PM2.5  (µg/m3)
AQI USEPA
(2012)
PM10
(µg/m3)
AQI USEPA
(2012)
PM2.5
(µg/m3)
AQI USEPA
(2012)
PM10
(µg/m3)
AQI USEPA
(2012)
Iwaye
17.8±3.21
55.5
32.2±4.18
29.8
16.0±2.50
51.9
28.4±3.15
26.3
Idode
20.6±2.23
61.0
47.8±3.72
44.3
18.2±1.50
56.4
44.2±3.65
40.9
Isara
18.4±1.21
56.7
35.6±4.38
33.0
15.9±2.40
51.8
31.4±2.15
29.0
Ogbere
24.6±3.11
68.9
49.5±3.73
45.8
19.0±2.00
57.8
43.7±2.25
40.4
Ilagbe
26.6±2.21
72.8
49.9±4.48
46.2
24.1±1.50
68.0
46.0±3.15
42.6
Adelokun
24.8±3.51
69.2
42.6±2.74
39.4
22.5±0.80
64.7
38.6±2.45
35.7
Baaki Ake
31.5±2.22
82.4
55.3±4.58
51. 2
29.2±0.59
77.9
51.0±3.13
47. 2
Igodo
31.7±3.91
82.8
53.9±3.75
49.9
28.8±0.90
77.3
49.7±2.17
46
Control
12.5±0.31
40.6
28.2±0.21
26. 1
22.6±0.61
65.0
33.4±0.91
30.9
Overall Mean±SD
23.2±6.42
43.9±9.78
21.8±5.00
40.7±8.15
World Health Organisation [17]
15
45
15
45
T-statistic
-106
-63.2
-137
-77.0
P-value
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Source of variation
F
P-value
Locations
14.4
1.84E-07
Samples
91.1
2.96E-13

Table 4. Gaseous pollutant in dry and wet seasons (N=3).
Location
 
CO2 ( µg/m3)
CO (µg/m3)
NO2 ( µg/m3)
SO2 ( µg/m3)
Ozone ( µg/m3)
Dry season
Wet season
Dry season
Wet season
Dry season
Wet season
Dry season
Wet season
Dry season
Wet season
Iwaye
393±5.45
380±1.40
0.01±0.00
0.00±0.00
5.15±1.60
4.66±2.10
6.44±1.61
6.01±1.61
18.3±1.60
14.9±2.60
Idode
382±4.15
366±2.60
0.01±0.00
0.01±0.00
6.23±1.61
5.84±1.60
7.06±2.60
7.00±2.60
21.3±1.61
17.9±1.67
Isara
393±5.25
379±1.67
0.01±0.00
0.01±0.00
5.32±2.60
5.11±2.20
6.54±1.64
6.21±1.66
20.4±2.64
16.5±2.40
Ogbere
387±3.55
373±2.60
0.01±0.00
0.01±0.00
6.84±1.64
6.39±1.60
7.12±3.60
6.90±2.60
24.2±1.63
18.6±1.62
Ilagbe
399±5.63
386±1.65
0.02±0.00
0.01±0.00
6.97±0.60
6.48±2.40
8.16±2.66
8.05±1.63
27.4±2.63
22.8±0.40
Adelokun
422±2.75
406±2.60
0.01±0.00
0.01±0.00
8.43±1.63
7.75±1.40
9.57±2.60
9.17±0.60
24.9±1.61
21.3±1.64
Baaki Ake
416±5.82
403±1.63
0.02±0.00
0.01±0.00
7.54±1.60
7.07±2.60
8.29±1.67
8.11±1.65
27.0±2.67
23.3±0.80
Igodo
412±1.95
392±2.60
0.01±0.00
0.01±0.00
7.75±0.67
7.01±1.30
9.63±1.56
8.45±0.60
26.2±1.68
24.5±1.69
Control
402±5.43
380±1.61
0.01±0.00
0.01±0.00
5.12±1.60
3.42±2.60
5.64±1.69
5.52±1.63
17.2±2.60
19.6±0.91
World Health Organisation [17]
400
400
4
4
25
25
40
40
100
100
Overall Mean
400±10.00
385±2.60
0.01±0.00
0.01±0.00
6.59±2.61
5.97±2.67
7.61±2.60
7.27±2.55
23.0±2.60
19.9±2.61
t test
14.4
2.12
4.34
2.94
3.97
p value
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.02
0.00
 

In the wet season, PM2.5 had Isara (15.89±2.40 µg/m3) lowest and Baaki Ake (29.2±0.59 µg/m3) highest and among the values across locations. Only Iwaye (16.0±2.50 µg/m3), Idode (18.2±1.50 µg/m3), Isara (15.9±2.40 µg/m3) and Ogbere (19.0±2.00 µg/m3) were lower than the control (22.6 µg/m3). Those that were lower than the control were as a result of low production during the wet season [5]. Hence this means that quarry activities affected the neighbouring villages with PM2.5. When comparing these values with WHO limit (15 µg/m3), all were higher than the WHO Limit. There were also significant differences among the values across locations. However, the AQI for PM2.5 (wet season) at Iwaye (51.9), Idode (56.4), Isara (51.8), Ogbere (57.8), Ilagbe (68.0), Adelokun (64.7), Baaki Ake (77.9), Igodo (77.3) and control (65.0) are within AQI values of 51 – 100; indicating moderate health.

Moreover, PM10 during wet season were between 28.4±3.15 and 51.0±3.13 µg/m3 for Iwaye and Baaki Ake respectively. Except Iwaye (28.4±3.15 µg/m3) and Isara (31.4±2.15 µg/m3), other locations were higher than the control (33.4±0.91 µg/m3). Therefore, it can be inferred that quarrying increased the PM10 of the surrounding environments around the quarries. The WHO Limit (45 µg/m3) was higher than all the PM10 values across the locations with the exception of Ilagbe (46.0±3.15), Baaki Ake (51.0±3.13) and Igodo (49.7±2.17). However, there were significant differences among the values across locations. Oguntoke, et al. [6] reported that the results of their study showed that the highest mean SPM levels among the selected quarries vary between 26.0±1.36 mg/m3 and 11.03±1.52 mg/m3. The AQI for PM10 (wet season) at Iwaye (26.3), Idode (40.9), Isara (29.0), Ogbere (40.4), Ilagbe (42.6), Adelokun (35.7), Baaki Ake (47.2), Igodo (46) and control (30.9) all are within AQI values of 0 – 50; indicating good health.

The reason why some of the results in Table 3 were below WHO limit (15 and 45 µg/m3) for PM2.5 and PM10 respectively is that the sampling was carried out in the nearby hamlet or village; rather than the inwards or immediate frontage of the quarry sites. Hence, the dusts or particulate matters could have settled or subsided before reaching nearby villages. This trend has been observed by several authors including [9, 13] .

The t – test of Particulate Matter in Dry and Wet Season was presented in Table 3; where there were significant differences (variance) among the values of particulate matter; (PM2.5 and PM10 in the dry season and PM2.5 and PM10 in the wet season respectively). This implies that the values of the PM2.5 and PM10 in the dry season were higher than that of the PM2.5 and PM10 in the wet season. There were significant differences among the values of PM2.5   across locations in both seasons. Also, there were significant differences among the values of PM10 across locations in dry season and wet season. These results were in agreement with the results obtained by Rikhtegar, et al. [12]; such that the dry season was occasioned by excessive dust deposition.

Table 4 shows the values of gaseous pollutants in dry and wet season. In the dry season, the CO2 values range between Idode (382.±4.15 μg/m3) and Adelokun (422±2.75 μg/m3). Except Igodo (412±1.95 μg/m3), Baaki Ake (416±5.82 μg/m3) and Adelokun (422±2.75 μg/m3) that were higher than the control (402±5.43 μg/m3); other five locations were lower. This implies that quarry activities reduced the CO2   of the air composition [14]. However, all these values in all locations were within the WHO Limit (400 μg/m3) except Adelokun (422±2.75 μg/m3), Baaki Ake (416±5.82 μg/m3) Igodo (412±1.95 μg/m3) and the control. This can be attributed to the anthropogenic activities like bush burning, cooking with firewood, heavy duty vehicular emission and so on that is ongoing in and around these locations. When the CO2 is out of the limit, it could result in headaches, sleepiness, stuffy air, poor concentration, loss of attention, increased heart rate, slight nausea, drowsiness and poor air.

The CO values were within 0.01±0.00 – 0.02±0.00 µg/m3 across locations and all the values were within the ambit of the control site (0.01±0.00 µg/m3) except Ilagbe and Baaki Ake (0.02±0.00 µg/m3) which means that quarrying does not increase the value of CO content of the air composition. However, all locations were lower than the WHO limit (4 µg/m3). Peter, et al. [15] reported that the carbon monoxide at a distance of 250 m away from the Akpoha quarry site was 1600 μg/m3 and at the edge of the quarry (3200 μg/m3). Moreover, CO is a blood pollutant; it tends to form carboxyl-haemoglobin that prevent oxygen from being converged to the blood stream. More so, it impairs normal breathing and portends serious health implication [11]. 

Among the NO2 values, Adelokun was the highest with 8.43±1.63 µg/m3; while Iwaye was the lowest with 5.15±1.60 µg/m3. None was lower than the control (5.12±1.60 µg/m3) which implies that quarrying increased the content of NO2 of the air composition around quarries. All the values across locations were lower than the WHO limit of 25 µg/m3. More so, NO2 is a toxic gas which causes significant inflammation of the airways. Hence, it should not be allowed to exceed the WHO Limit. Peter, et al. [15] asserted that at the Ishiagu quarry site in the dry season, the following values of NOx values were recorded at various distances; edge (40.5 µg/m3); 250 m (38.5 µg/m3); 500 m (30.6 µg/m3); 750 m (15.5 µg/m3).

SO2 ranges between 6.44±1.61 µg/m3 (Iwaye) – 9.63±1.56 µg/m3 (Igodo) across location and among these; none was lower than the control (5.64±1.69 µg/m3). This implies that quarry activities increased the amount of SO2 in the air component around quarries [1]. However, all the SO2 values across the locations were lower that the WHO Limit (40 µg/m3). The  following  values of SOx were recorded in the dry season at the various distances from Ishiagu quarry site by Peter, et al. [15]; edge (90.6 µg/m3); 250 m (75.5 µg/m3); 500 m (60.4 µg/m3); 750 m (25 µg/m3).

None of the values of the Ozone (O3) (18.3±1.60 – 27.0±2.67 µg/m3) were lower than the control (17.2±2.60 µg/m3). This implies that quarrying affects the O3 content of the surrounding air component around quarries [14]. All the values from various locations were lower than the WHO Limit (100 µg/m3). However, excessive ozone in the air can have a serious effect on human health such as breathing problems, asthma, reduced lung function and lung diseases.

In the wet season, the values of CO2 range between 365.91±2.60 – 405.98±2.60 µg/m3; with Idode (lowest) and Baaki Ake (highest) respectively and except Idode (366±2.60 µg/m3), Isara (379±1.67 µg/m3) and Ogbere (373±2.60 µg/m3) that were lower than the control (380±1.61 µg/m3), other five locations were higher. This implies that quarrying during rainy season increased the amount of CO2 in the air around quarries [1]. However, the CO2 is an agent of global warming. Hence, it is very dangerous to the environment. None of these values of the CO2 across locations were higher than the WHO limit (400 µg/m3) and there was significant difference between the dry and wet season values of CO2

The amount of the CO content in the air during wet season around quarries were between 0.00±0.00 – 0.01±0.00 µg/m3; with Iwaye (lowest) and Igodo (highest) respectively. Except Iwaye (0.00±0.00 µg/m3) that was lower than the control (0.01±0.00 µg/m3), other locations were within the frame of control [1]. The implication of this is that quarrying does not affect the CO content of the air around quarries. Comparing these values of CO with WHO Limit (4 µg/m3) revealed that none was higher. There was no significant difference between the dry and wet season values of CO.

None of the values of NO2 (4.66±2.10 – 7.75±1.40 µg/m3) in different locations was lower than the control (3.42±2.60 µg/m3). This means that quarry activities increased the content of NO2 in the air during wet season. Moreover, none of the values of different locations was higher than the WHO standard of 25 µg/m3. According [15], the Ishiagu quarry site in the rainy season recorded the following values of NOx at various distances; (30.2 µg/m3); 250m (28.5 µg/m3); 500 m (25 µg/m3); 750 m (8.6 µg/m3). The implication of this is that whenever it rains NO2 in atmosphere, it will definitely react with rain water and form corresponding acid; which is the nitric acid (HNO3), on getting to the soil that have abundant of metals deposit and free radicals; the acid will react with them and form corresponding salt of nitrate; that could be eventually washed into nearby surface water or leached into the groundwater by rain runoff. In the aftermath that the water bodies containing nitrate is consumed by infants, there is possibility that the nitrate will be absorbed into their blood, prevent O2 transportation, and can cause a disease called blue baby syndrome or methaemoglobinaemia. There was significant difference between the values of NO2 in dry and wet seasons. All the values of SO2 in all locations (6.01±1.61 – 9.17±0.60 µg/m3) were higher than the control (5.52±1.63 µg/m3) with no exception [1]. This means that quarry activities increased the content of the SO2 in the air around quarries during the wet season. All values of SO2 (6.01±1.61 – 9.17±0.60 µg/m3) were lower than WHO permissible limit of 40 µg/m3. The implication of this is that whenever, it rains, the SO2 will react with rain water and form H2SO4 and when it is washed into the nearby surface water and soil; will makes them more acidic. This is very dangerous for consumption, laundry and agricultural purpose. There was significant difference between the values of SO2 in dry and wet seasons.

Ozone (O3) ranges between 14.9±2.60 – 24.5±1.69 µg/m3; with Iwaye (lowest) and Igodo (highest) respectively. Four locations were lower than the control (19.6±0.91 µg/m3); while four locations were higher [14].  All the values were lower than the WHO limit (100 µg/m3). The reduction in the values of the O3 in some locations during the wet season was as a result of low production in those quarries during wet season. There was significant difference between the dry and wet season values of O3.

The values of gaseous pollutants sampled during dry season were relatively higher than those of wet season. This is because most of these gases will dissolve in the rain water and formed corresponding acids that will eventually be washed down to the soil. Hence, it will make the atmosphere a bit free from all the gases. Also, for the fact that there is no much activities of the quarries during wet season, there is likelihood of less pollution of the atmosphere with these sampled gases [12].

4. CONCLUSION

As regard the air component compounds such as CO2, only three locations like Adelokun, Baaki ake and Igodo (dry season) were affected and surpassed WHO Limit. In wet season only Idode, Isara, Ogbere were not affected but the rest locations were affected with only Adelokun, and Baaki ake that above WHO limit. CO in all locations were not affected in both seasons with the exception of Ilagbe and Baaki ake but within WHO Limit in dry season. In case of NO2, all locations were affected in both seasons but within the WHO limit.   There were increment in the values of SO2 in all locations (dry and wet seasons) but within WHO limit. In dry season all locations were affected with increment in O3 level but within WHO limit; whereas in wet season only four locations were affected namely Ilagbe, Adelokun, Baaki ake and Igodo; the remaining were not affected by the quarry activities. Concerning particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), the surrounding locations were affected in dry season and higher than their corresponding WHO Limits, with the exception of Iwaye, Isara, and Adelokun (PM10). In wet season the particulate matter of PM2.5 affects Ilagbe, Baaki Ake and Igodo and all locations were higher than the WHO Limit, while PM10 affected all locations with the exception of Iwaye and Isara and only Ilagbe, Baaki Ake and Igodo were higher than the WHO Limit. The reason why most results in dry season were higher than wet season is not far–fetched. This is because construction and infrastructure sectors that are the major end users of the quarry products are always on break during wet season; hence low patronage of the quarry products and the quarry activities are lesser. It can be concluded that some parameters are outrageous and very dangerous to human health and environment e.g. PM2.5 and PM10; while those that are dangerous and within the regulatory limit could become outrageous e.g. CO, NO2; if care is not taken, they might aggravate to uncontrollable level that could grossly affect the environment and human health.

Funding: This study received no specific financial support.  
Competing Interests: The author declares that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

REFERENCES

 [1]      I. A. Hassan, "Assessment of the socio-economic and health impact of quarrying on the inhabitants of Kenta Logemo village in Odeda local government area, Ogun State, Nigeria," Environment and Natural Resources Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2022a.  https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v12n1p29

[2]          I. Hassan, "Physicochemical characteristics of the soil around the quarry sites in Ogun State, Nigeria," Ife Journal of Science, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 399-417, 2022b.

[3]          S. Abdul-Wahab, I. Osman, and N. Al-Shukaili, "Air quality assessment for Kunooz Gabbro quarry in Oman: Assessment of PM10," International Journal of Pioneering Technology and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 61-72, 2022.  https://doi.org/10.56158/jpte.2022.29.1.02

 [4]         G. Kunooz, "Mining and quarrying ", Retrieved: http://kunoozoman.com/mining-and-quarrying/ , 2022.

[5]          D. Tartakovsky, E. Stern, and D. M. Broday, "Dispersion of TSP and PM10 emissions from quarries in complex terrain," Science of the Total Environment, vol. 542, pp. 946-954, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.133

[6]          O. Oguntoke, A. Aboaba, and T. A. Gbadebo, "Impact of granite quarrying on the health of workers and nearby residents in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Ethiopian," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v2i1.43497

[7]          A. Akanwa, F. Okeke, V. Nnodu, and E. Iortyom, "Quarrying and its effect on vegetation cover for a sustainable development using high-resolution satellite image and GIS," Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 76, no. 14, pp. 1-12, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6844-x

[8]          V. K. Nartey, J. N. Nanor, and R. K. Klake, "Effects of quarry activities on some selected communities in the lower Manya Krobo district of the eastern region of Ghana," Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 362–372, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2012.23032

[9]          K. Raispour, "Evaluation of spatiotemporal column particulate matter concentration (PM2.5) due to dust events in Iran using data from NASAN/MERRA-2 reanalysis model," Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 333-354, 2021.

[10]        J. Banez, M. A. S., J. R. Bilolo, and J. M. Dailyn, "Quarrying and its environmental effects. P1o," Retrieved: www.scribd.com . [Accessed 2022], 2023.

[11]        T. Sayara, "Environmental impact assessment of quarries and stone cutting industries in Palestine: Case study of Jammain," Journal of Environment Protection and Sustainable Development, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 32-38, 2016.

[12]        N. Rikhtegar, N. Mansouri, A. A. Oroumieh, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, E. Kazimieras Zavadskas, and S. Kildienė, "Environmental impact assessment based on group decision-making methods in mining projects," Economic Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 378-392, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2014.966971

[13]        L. Li, C. Lu, P. W. Chan, X. Zhang, H. L. Yang, and L. Z.J., "Tower observed vertical distribution of PM2.5, O3 and NOx in the pearl river delta," Atmospheric Environment, vol. 220, p. 117083, 2020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117083

[14]        B. S. Bada, K. A. Olatunde, and O. A. Akande, "Air quality assessment in the vicinity of quarry site," Environment and Natural Resources Research Canadian Center Science and Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2-3, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v3n2p111

[15]        C. Peter, M. Alozie, and C. Azubuine, "Stone quarrying impact on air soil water in Ebonyi State, Nigeria," Journal of Pollution Effects & Control, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-4, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4397.1000225

[16]        National Population Commission, "Federal republic of Nigeria, legal notice on publication of 2006 census final results," 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.npc.ng.org.com

[17]        World Health Organisation, "Ambient outdoor air pollution," Retrieved: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health . 2022.

[18]        United States Environmental Protection Agency, "Air quality index air quality communication." El Salvador: Workshop San Salvador, 2012, pp. 2–26.

Views and opinions expressed in this article are the views and opinions of the author(s), International Journal of Natural Sciences Research shall not be responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use of the content.