Comparison between Decision Making Method for Success Right or Wrong of Software Development Project

Authors

  • Kazuhiro Esaki Faculty of Science and Engineering, HOSEI University, Koganei-shi, Tokyo, Japan
  • Kizuku Kuwahara Faculty of Science and Engineering, HOSEI University, Koganei-shi, Tokyo, Japan
  • Tetsu Sagae Faculty of Science and Engineering, HOSEI University, Koganei-shi, Tokyo, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.11/2015.4.12/11.12.237.247

Abstract

For a purpose of improvement of project management, we should determine the success right or wrong of project objectively and quantitatively. On the other hand, a decision of success right or wrong of software development projects has been evaluated subjectively by a questionnaire for stakeholders concerned. Furthermore, the study of definition of project success right or wrong and quantitative decision techniques is not found. Recently, gathering of the attribute data about software development projects in Japan has been performed by the IPA/SEC (Software Engineering Centre of the Information-Technology Promotion Agency Japan). Therefore, we developed the diagnostic technique to judge the success right or wrong on a project by a discriminant analysis based on the actual data of IPA/SECs in the precedent study. Also, we tried to develop the diagnostic technique of success right or wrong of project based on the “Success degree estimation mode” in this study. In this paper, we would like to propose the result of comparison between the effectiveness of these diagnostic techniques of the project.

Keywords:

Software development, Project management, Success degree, Discriminant analysis, Diagnostic technique, Judgment techniques, Hiiting ratio, Estimation model

Abstract Video

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-01-21

How to Cite

Esaki, K. ., Kuwahara, K. ., & Sagae, T. . (2016). Comparison between Decision Making Method for Success Right or Wrong of Software Development Project. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 4(12), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.11/2015.4.12/11.12.237.247

Issue

Section

Articles