Global metrics, local realities: STEAM faculty research in Philippine SUCs

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the research engagement of STEAM faculty in Philippine State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) by applying the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) Researcher Classification Framework and the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) Scientific Career System. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative data on ISI- and Scopus-indexed publications, authorship patterns, research supervision, and training participation with survey responses from STEAM faculty members across five SUCs in Region II. Qualitative insights from administrators, research directors, and faculty narratives complemented the survey data. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative interviews underwent thematic content analysis. Findings show that SUCs 1 to 3 generally meet CHED’s First Stage Researcher category and DOST’s Scientist I–II level, though none have advanced to higher classifications. By contrast, SUCs 4 and 5 exhibit deeper gaps, with no faculty members qualifying under either framework, despite having a relatively high number of master’s degree holders. Barriers across institutions include limited publication output, inconsistent mentoring, and insufficient institutional support for sustained research leadership. The study concludes that promoting inclusive, performance-oriented research requires strategies that align national goals with faculty development and match institutional practices to global academic standards.